Outside the library is a "machine" that sells the local newspapers, and this story was splashed all across the front page today. It's about a boy, Darnell "Dynasty" Young, who brought a stun gun to school as a way to protect himself from bullying. He now faces expulsion. The twist is that his mother, desperate to protect her son from bullying, gave him the stun gun. The other twist is that Darnell is openly gay, and a little flamboyant.
When I first saw this headline (without having read any of the story itself) I thought, okay, lightly punish him because A) weapons aren't permitted in schools and B) despite the fact that his mother gave him the stun gun, he's old enough to know what's right and wrong. It wasn't until I read the full story that I learned he was being bullied for being gay, and that kids had thrown rocks and bottles at him.
Now that I read the story though, I have a very different response. And it's not just because Darnell is gay. It's because of the reaction of the school administrators. They blame Darnell for being bullied just because he's openly gay! They say he's too flamboyant, that he shouldn't be so into dance, or want to accessorize his outfits. They claim he draws too much attention to himself by doing these things and that's why he's being bullied. I cannot articulate how furious that makes me, and how much that breaks my heart.
I am lucky enough that the most homophobic bullying I've ever endured anywhere is when a few kids in my junior high school asked if I was a lesbian. I had no idea what the word meant at the time, so when I hesitantly answered no (I didn't know if it was good or bad to be lesbian and I didn't want to be on "the wrong side", so to speak--already having endured years of bullying for other things, I wanted to avoid yet more of it) all they did was turn around and snicker. No one's called me a faggot, no one's threatened to beat me up for liking other girls, no one's thrown things at me or raided my locker or poked fun at me in the locker rooms. I know I am incredibly lucky in this.
There's a saying that goes around the internet that people are more comfortable seeing two men hold guns than they are seeing two men holding hands. Why is that? People would rather see lives destroyed than lives filled with joy and love? Please someone explain to me why this is?! I don't understand it. Not in the least.
The article puts forth these questions: How can parents protect their children from bullying? Is self-defense a valid excuse for violating school rules? Where does a school's responsibility begin and end?
This is my answer:
When it comes to bullying at school, it is completely and utterly up to school administrators and officials to stop it and protect the children. Teachers and staff are there to educate and guide their students, and by not stopping the bullying, they are telling the bullies that what they are doing is okay. It's not. No one deserves to be bullied, and, I can't say this plainly enough: NO ONE EVER ASKS TO BE BULLIED. My childhood is filled with being bullied, it's colored who I am and done a number on my self confidence. Before bullying I was a leader, after a few years of being bullied, I was so much a follower I could barely even think for myself. I'm not exaggerating. It's taken me an effing long time to get back what little confidence I've managed to gain. It wasn't easy and it's still an ongoing process.
If school administrators and officials will not do their job, then I say the only choice a student has is self defense. A parent cannot (and should not) be there every minute of their child's day to protect them. The student needs to learn to stand up for themself. If the student doesn't go to school, they get in trouble for missing too much and face expulsion--not only that, but it damages their record if they miss too much, and then it can negatively impact their future. I fall back on my own experience to support this position. Again, in junior high, my friends had turned on me (for reasons I still don't know) and one of them threatened to beat me up. This had nothing to do with being gay--I had no idea about my sexuality at the time. Why Amanda wanted to fight me, I don't know. I just remember one day, after lunch, standing on a staircase and her saying "meet me right here, right after school and we'll settle this". I don't know what she wanted to settle, but again, I was lucky (Sagittarians are infamous for being lucky) and there was an alternate route to get to the school buses, and thus, safety. But what would've happened if there hadn't been that alternate route? I would've been forced to defend myself, possibly by fighting.
This is getting long, so I'll wrap it up and say that if someone is merely defending themself, they should not face severe punishments. I think, in this case, expulsion is far too severe. I'd give him a few weeks of detention, or ban him from dances and talent competitions, or have him write an essay on why weapons aren't allowed--something like that. Expelling someone for defending themself teaches them that in life, they have to just sit back and let the world dish a bunch of shit on them--that they can't do anything about it. Why would we want to teach people to be followers instead of leaders? Why would we want bullies to get away with what they're doing? When you punish the victims, that is what you are doing and allowing. And that, I believe, is why we have a bullying epidemic in this country--because people are taught that they can't stand up for themselves, and victims are punished just as much as bullies (assuming the bullies are punished at all!).
In conclusion, I will say this: no one invites bullying when they are just being themself. No one--I don't care what race, nationality, creed, religion, sexuality, gender identity, whatever--should be punished just for being who they are. Ever.